On 19 August 2025, the Ministry of Science and Technology (“MOST”) unveiled the second draft of the Law on Digital Transition (“Draft Law”) for public consultation. This marks a bold step in Vietnam’s ambition to position itself as a regional digital powerhouse, laying the groundwork for widespread adoption of AI, big data, IoT, cloud computing, and blockchain.
If adopted, the Draft Law will not only reshape how organizations operate in Vietnam but also redefine the country’s digital economy and governance model.
1. A National Digital Framework
The Draft Law defines Vietnam’s digital transformation through three core pillars: digital data, digital infrastructure, and digital platforms. Together, they form the backbone of the nation’s digital journey. Telecoms networks, data centers, cloud facilities, and IoT connectivity are prioritized for fast-track investment, with preferential policies on tax, land, and industry support to attract private capital and fuel innovation.
2. Drawing the Red Lines
Article 5 sets out a hard list of prohibitions, signalling Vietnam’s determination to guard its digital sovereignty. Banned activities include:
These prohibitions underline a central theme: innovation yes, abuse no.
3. Government as the Digital Trailblazer
State agencies are tasked with leading by example. They must:
This push aims to reinforce trust in digital governance while unlocking efficiency gains across the public sector.
4. Defining the Digital Economy
The Draft Law casts a wide net:
To catalyse growth, the Government promises tax and credit incentives, advisory programs, and controlled “sandbox” pilots to safely test new digital business models.
5. Clear Duties for Digital Actors
The Draft Law assigns obligations across the ecosystem:
Vietnam’s Draft Law on Digital Transition signals a new era for the country’s digital economy. With strong guardrails, incentives for growth, and a focus on trust and transparency, the law aims to create an ecosystem where innovation thrives within clear boundaries.
The consultation period offers stakeholders a valuable opportunity to shape the rules that will define Vietnam’s digital future. For further insights on the Draft Law on Digital Transition or other regulatory developments in Vietnam, please contact DFDL.
The information provided here is for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained from qualified legal counsel for all specific situations.
On 14 June 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam passed the Law on Digital Technology Industry (the “Law”), marking a significant milestone in the country’s digital transformation journey. Effective from 1 January 2026, the Law introduces Vietnam’s first comprehensive legal framework for digital assets and sets forth core principles for artificial intelligence (AI) governance.
This legislative development demonstrates Vietnam’s commitment to fostering innovation while ensuring regulatory oversight in line with international standards. Below is a summary of the Law’s key provisions on AI and digital assets and their implications for businesses and stakeholders.
1. Overview of the Law
The Law governs the development, deployment, and regulation of digital technologies in Vietnam. It covers a broad range of areas including digital infrastructure, data governance, cybersecurity, and emerging technologies. Key objectives include:
Chapters IV and V of the Law – focused on Artificial Intelligence and Digital Assets, respectively – are especially notable for businesses operating in these sectors.
2. Key Provisions on Artificial Intelligence (AI)
2.1 Definition and Scope
The Law defines AI as a machine-based system capable of learning from data to generate decisions, predictions, or content that affects physical or digital environments. AI systems are considered digital technology products comprising software, hardware, and data.
2.2 Principles of AI Governance
The Law establishes foundational principles for the safe and ethical use of AI:
2.3 Regulatory Requirements
2.4 Implications for Business
The prospect of generous government incentives may create strong opportunities for R&D and commercialization of AI systems in Vietnam. On the other hand, businesses developing and operating AI systems will need to develop compliance protocols, particularly for high-risk use cases.
3. Key Provisions on Digital Assets
3.1 Definition and Classification
The Law defines a digital asset as a property right under the Civil Code, expressed in digital form and authenticated via digital technologies. It recognizes two primary categories:
Interestingly, the Law expressly excludes securities, digital forms of fiat currency, and other financial assets as prescribed by civil and financial laws from the definition of both virtual and coded assets. But a third category of “other assets” leaves room for future treatment of such financial assets as digital assets.
3.2 Regulatory Framework
3.3 Implications for Business
The recognition of digital assets under civil law provides more legal certainty for market participants. While regulatory compliance will require investment, especially in AML/CFT measures, and there are still many open questions to be addressed through regulation, Vietnam is positioning itself as a digital asset-friendly jurisdiction with favorable policies for innovation.
4. Outlook and Next Steps
The Law will take effect on 1 January 2026. It represents a foundational shift for Vietnam’s digital regulatory landscape. Its key impacts include:
The Government will issue detailed implementing regulations, clarifying, among others, issues in relation to AI and digital assets. Businesses should closely monitor these developments and seek legal counsel to ensure readiness.
Conclusion
Vietnam’s new Law on Digital Technology Industry signals a decisive step toward a secure, innovation-driven digital economy. By establishing basic principles for AI and digital assets, the Law not only fills longstanding legal gaps but also takes a step towards aligning Vietnam’s regulatory architecture with global trends. While further guidance is expected, the Law lays a more robust foundation for the country’s digital future.
The information provided here is for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained from qualified legal counsel for all specific situations.
On 3 June 2025, the Government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 115/2025/ND-CP (“Decree 115“) to provide detailed implementation guidance for various provisions of the Law on Telecommunications 2023. Decree 115 introduces a clearer and more structured legal framework for the management and allocation of telecom numbers and Internet resources, as well as rules on leasing and compensation mechanisms.
Key Objectives of Decree 115:
In particular, the Decree introduces the following changes:
1. Dual-Track Procedures for Telecom Number Allocation
Decree 115 introduces two distinct methods for telecom number allocation:
Articles 6 and 7 of Decree 115 outline detailed procedures for both mechanisms, improving transparency and providing applicants with greater predictability.
2. Utilization Thresholds for Subsequent Allocations
To promote efficient usage and prevent number hoarding, Decree 115 sets out minimum utilization thresholds that applicants must meet before seeking additional allocations. Articles 8 to 16 of Decree 115 specify that:
3. Legal Framework for Leasing Telecom Numbers
For the first time, Vietnam formally recognizes the practice of leasing telecom numbers between licensed operators. Articles 30 to 34 of Decree 115 introduce:
4. Compensation Mechanisms for Reclaimed Telecom Resources
Decree 115 establishes a compensation regime for cases where telecom numbers or Internet resources are reclaimed outside of enterprise fault. Key points under Articles 35 and 36 of Decree 115 include:
5. Auction Procedures for “.vn” Domains and High-Demand Numbers
Articles 37 to 45 of Decree 115 introduce new procedures for the auction of high-value telecom numbers and certain “.vn” domain names. Highlights include:
Implications for the Telecom Sector
Decree 115 marks a significant step forward in modernizing Vietnam’s telecommunications regulatory regime. It provides a unified and enforceable legal structure, replacing the previous patchwork of rules and circulars. Key provisions on number allocation, leasing, and compensation increase regulatory clarity and reduce market uncertainty.
Enterprises operating in the telecom and digital services sectors should closely review Decree 115 to align internal compliance protocols and take advantage of new opportunities created by the updated framework.
For further advice on the implications of Decree 115 or support with regulatory procedures, please contact our team.
The information provided here is for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained from qualified legal counsel for all specific situations.
The Indonesian government has issued a new regulation, PP No. 17/2025, concerning the governance of electronic systems for child protection. This regulation aims to ensure the safety and well-being of children using electronic systems. Key highlights include:
This regulation is a significant step towards creating a safer digital environment for children. If you’re an electronic system provider, tech company, or legal/compliance professional, it’s time to take note!
The information provided here is for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained from qualified legal counsel for all specific situations.
On 12 April 2025, the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561, the primary law governing digital assets in Thailand, was amended.
The amendment is called the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (the “Emergency Decree (No. 2)”) and had effect immediately upon its publication in the Royal Thai Government Gazette.
The primary focus of Emergency Decree (No. 2) is to clarify and codify the extraterritorial application of the original digital asset law. Businesses subject to the law, called “digital asset business operators,”1 now include those “operating outside the Kingdom of Thailand but providing services to persons within the Kingdom of Thailand, except for those providing services as prescribed by the S.E.C. [The Thai Securities and Exchange Commission].”2
Accordingly, unless falling under an exception prescribed by the S.E.C., digital asset business operators based outside of Thailand but providing services to Thai residents or other persons located in Thailand are now subject to this Thai digital asset law. The S.E.C.’s definition of digital asset business operators includes exchanges, brokers, dealers, fund managers, advisors and custodians dealing with cryptocurrencies or digital tokens.3
Emergency Decree (No. 2) sets forth seven bright-line factors to determine whether a digital business operator is deemed to have provided services to people located within Thailand. This is pursuant to a new Section 26/14:
These seven factors closely resemble those introduced in 2022 in the Royal Decree on the Operation of Digital Platform Service Businesses that are Subject to Prior Notification B.E. 2565 (the “Royal Decree”). The interpretation of those factors may be instructive for determining how the S.E.C. will interpret these seven newly codified factors.5
In contrast to the unofficial “reverse solicitation” safe harbor often invoked by foreign service providers,6 the new seven factors of the Emergency Decree (No. 2) establish a bright-line test when a digital asset business operator is considered to be soliciting customers within Thailand:
The S.E.C. may also add to this list under Section 26/1(7). Further, the S.E.C. may issue interpretative guidance to resolve ambiguities and to add details to the other six factors.
1See Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561, Section 3
2Unofficial translation of Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 3. While we have taken every effort to convey meaning and effect accurately in our unofficial translation, we disclaim responsibility and liability if our unofficial translation differs materially from any translation published by the S.E.C. in the future. Only the original Thai version carries legal authority.
3See the Notification of the Ministry of Finance regarding licensing of digital asset businesses B.E. 2561 (Consolidated), Section 2.
4Unofficial translation of Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 4. While we have taken every effort to convey meaning and effect accurately in our unofficial translation, we disclaim responsibility and liability if our unofficial translation differs materially from any translation published by the S.E.C. in the future. Only the original Thai version carries legal authority.
5Section 10 of the Royal Decree lists seven basic factors with very similar wording to determine whether a foreign service provider has provided services to users located within Thailand. The legal interpretation of these factors may be useful as guidance as to how the Emergency Decree (No. 2) factors will be interpreted. However, we advise caution to not rely completely on prior interpretations of the Royal Decree factors. First, several of the Emergency Decree (No. 2) factors have been written with minor changes to the Royal Decree factors. Second, and more importantly, the Royal Decree is implemented by a different government agency, the Electronic Transactions Development Agency, operating under a different ministry than the S.E.C.
6“Reverse solicitation” is a concept relied upon by some foreign companies to argue that Thai law should not apply to them, even though they provide goods or services to customers within Thailand. The argument is that Thai law should not extend to a foreign goods or service provider if it does not actively solicit customers in Thailand. Instead, if it happens to gain customers in Thailand because those customers reach out on their own to buy its goods or service, then it should not be subject to Thai law. There are uncodified factors that seem to have been at least acknowledged by some Thai regulators to determine whether a goods or service provider solicited the customer in Thailand, or whether the customer reached out and “reverse solicited” the goods or service provider.
7See Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 26/1(1).
8See Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 26/1(3).
9See Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 26/1(6).
10See Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 26/1(2).
11See Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 26/1(4).
12See Emergency Decree (No. 2), Section 26/1(5).
Key Highlights:
For more detailed information on the Prakas above, please click on download button below.
We are proud to share that DFDL Cambodia acted as lead counsel for the sellers in relation to Grab Inc.’s acquisition of Nham24, Cambodia’s leading food delivery and e-commerce platform. The team comprised of Chris Robinson, Clint O’Connell, Benjamine Medeville and Samnangvathana Sor. This transaction brings together Nham24’s local expertise and Grab’s advanced AI-driven technology, paving the way for innovation and growth in Cambodia’s digital economy. The business combination aims to drive sustainable, long-term growth for on-demand services like food delivery, grocery delivery and ride-hailing in Cambodia, creating more opportunities for everyday entrepreneurs.
We are honoured to have participated in this landmark transaction and look forward to seeing the positive impact that it will bring to the Cambodian economy.
The Government of Vietnam has officially issued Decree No. 147/2024/ND-CP on the management, provision, and use of internet services and online information (“Decree 147“). This new regulation, dated 9 November 2024, will take effect on 25 December 2024, replacing the earlier Decree No. 72/2013/ND-CP (“Decree 72“). This Decree 147 will affect domestic and foreign entities involved in managing, providing, or using internet services and online information, including social network service providers, online application providers, app stores, and online game providers.
Key Updates in Decree 147
1. Stricter Regulations for Social Networks
Under Decree 147, offshore social networks are classified as cross-border information provision services. Foreign enterprises providing such services into Vietnam, if they use data storage services in Vietnam, or they attract over 100,000 visits per month from Vietnam (calculated as an average over six consecutive months), they will have additional obligations beyond those stipulated in Decree 72 (e.g. notifying contact information to the Vietnamese Ministry of Information and Communications (“MIC”) and cooperating with the MIC to handle violations), in particular:
User Data Storage: Providers must store Vietnamese users’ information (full name, date of birth, and Vietnam-based mobile phone number or personal identification number). For users under 16 years old, their accounts must be registered by parents or legal guardians, who are also responsible for monitoring their activity.
Account Verification: User accounts must be verified using a Vietnam-based mobile phone number or, if unavailable, a personal identification number.
Commercial Livestreams: Accounts using livestream features for commercial purposes must undergo verification through personal identification numbers. Only verified accounts can post, comment, livestream, or share content.
Child Protection: Providers must classify and label inappropriate content for children and implement online safety measures.
Content Regulation: Providers must cooperate with Vietnamese authorities to offer search tools, scan content, and establish agreements with Vietnamese press agencies for media use. Unauthorized use of Vietnamese media sources is prohibited.
Compliance and Reporting: Providers must disseminate Vietnamese laws on internet use and cybersecurity to users and submit annual reports to the MIC by 25 November.
Notably, foreign providers that do not notify their contact information to the MIC are prohibited from offering livestream features or conducting revenue-generating activities for Vietnamese users.
2. Changes for Online Game Providers
The cross-border provision of online games remains prohibited, as stipulated in Decree 72. Offshore game publishers must establish a local entity in Vietnam to operate legally.
New Age Categories: A 16+ category has been introduced for games suitable only for users aged 16 and above.
License Name Changes: The “Decision on Approval of Content and Script for G1 Online Games” is now the “Decision on Issuance of G1 Online Games.” Meanwhile, the “Certificate of Notification for Providing G2, G3, G4 Online Game Services” is now the “Certificate of Notification for Issuance of G2, G3, G4 Online Games.”
While licensing procedures remain largely unchanged, technical systems must now manage daily playtime for users under 18, limiting it to: 60 minutes per game, and 180 minutes across all games provided by the same enterprise.
Games must prominently display a warning every 30 minutes: “Playing more than 180 minutes a day will negatively affect health.”
3. Increased Oversight of Offshore App Stores
Foreign app stores face stricter cooperation requirements with local authorities. They must:
In addition, Online game providers bear full responsibility for the accuracy of submitted information and documents.
Implications for Enterprises
Decree 147 introduces comprehensive regulations aimed at enhancing state oversight of internet services, particularly those provided by cross-border entities. Both domestic and foreign enterprises must carefully review the new requirements to ensure compliance.
It is strongly recommended that foreign service providers offering cross-border services to Vietnamese users seek legal advice to navigate the decree’s obligations effectively before it comes into effect on 25 December 2024.
The information provided is for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained from qualified legal counsel for all specific situations.
On 27 March 2024, the Cyber Security Bill 2024 (“Bill”) was passed by the Dewan Rakyat.
Malaysia does not currently have an all-encompassing cyber security legislation to safeguard digital infrastructure and the cyber domain. Cyber security requirements currently exist across multiple legislations, from the Personal Data Protection Act 2010, the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, Computer Crimes Act 1997, and others. Regulated entities are also subject to cyber security standards prescribed by the regulating authority, e.g. the Securities Commission of Malaysia has issued the Guidelines on Management of Cyber Risk in October 2016 and the Guidelines on Technology Risk Management in August 2023.
A summary of the key provisions of the Bill is set out below:
1. Applicability
The Bill has extra-territorial effect and applies in relation to any person, regardless of nationality or citizenship, within as well as outside Malaysia where, for the offence in question, the national critical information infrastructure (“NCII”) is wholly or partly in Malaysia.
While the Federal Government and State Governments will be bound by the Bill when it comes into force, they are not liable to prosecution for any offence under it.
2. National Cyber Security Committee (“NCSC”)
The Bill establishes the NCSC which is tasked with the responsibility of, among others:
3. Chief Executive of the National Cyber Security Agency (“Chief Executive”)
The National Cyber Security Agency (NACSA) was established in February 2017 as the national lead agency for cyber security matters. Under the Bill, the Chief Executive has, among others, the following duties:
4. NCII Sectors
The following have been specified as NCII sectors under the Bill:
5. NCII Sector Lead(s)
Under the Bill, the Minister charged with the responsibility of cyber security (“Minister”), may, upon the recommendation of the Chief Executive, appoint any government entity or person to be the NCII sector lead(s) for each of the NCII sectors.
Functions of the NCII sector lead(s), in respect of the NCII sector for which it is appointed, include among others:
6. NCII Entities
Where an NCII sector lead is satisfied that a government entity or person owns or operates an NCII, such government entity or person may be designated as an NCII entity, provided that a government entity can only be designated as an NCII entity by an NCII sector lead which is itself a government entity. An NCII sector lead may also be designated as an NCII entity by the Chief Executive.
Under the Bill, “NCII” is defined as a computer or computer system which the disruption to or destruction of the computer or computer system would have a detrimental impact on the delivery of any service essential to the security, defence, foreign relations, economy, public health, public safety or public order of Malaysia, or on the ability of the Federal Government or any of the State Governments to carry out its functions effectively.
NCII entities may lose their designations as an NCII entity where the NCII sector lead or, in the case of an NCII sector lead which has been designated as an NCII entity, the Chief Executive is satisfied that the NCII entity no longer owns or operates any NCII.
7. Requirements of NCII Entities
Under the Bill, NCII entities are required to, among others:
8. Cyber Security Incidents
Where a cyber security incident report has been made by an NCII entity, under the Bill, the Chief Executive is required to instruct an authorised officer to investigate the cyber security incident to determine if it has in fact occurred and, where it has, determine measures necessary to respond or recover from such incident and prevent a recurrence.
9. Licensing Requirement for Cyber Security Service Providers
Under the Bill, any person who provides a cyber security service or advertises, or in any way holds himself out as a cyber security service provider is required to hold a licence unless the service is being provided by a company to its related company.
The Bill does not specify what constitutes a “cyber security service”, the scope of which is left to the determination of the Minister.
Moving Forward
In compliance with the relevant regulatory guidelines, some regulated entities such as those regulated by the Bank Negara Malaysia, Securities Commission Malaysia, and the Labuan Financial Services Authority would already have cyber security policies, incident reporting obligations, business continuity systems, and emergency communications plans in place. The extension of such cyber security measures to the other identified NCII sectors where NCII sector lead(s) are empowered to issue industry-specific Practice Codes that are tailored to the nuances and unique risks of the industry will further strengthen Malaysia’s cyber security posture.
The establishment of the NCSC as a centralised authority to streamline efforts and ensure coordination among the different NCII sector lead(s) and industry stakeholders is crucial. Malaysia will undoubtedly benefit from a centralised committee to oversee cyber security threats and vulnerabilities of the Malaysian digital ecosystem, with a consolidated view and cohesive approach to identifying such threats and vulnerabilities, assessing cyber risks, and developing a national strategy to implement mitigation measures.
Cyber security has been identified as a tech enabler under the Program Mangkin Malaysia Digital (Pemangkin). In 2023, the Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC) allocated RM238 million for the 2023-2025 period to support new initiatives under Pemangkin, including RM45 million for tech enablers. In light of these initiatives, cyber security service providers such as those in the business of penetration testing, independent cyber audits, and cloud security services will inevitably play an increasingly important role in the country’s digital scene. Through the Malaysia Digital initiative, cyber security providers may apply for the Malaysia Digital Status which offers tax incentives, foreign knowledge worker quota and passes, and community benefits such as business matching and partnerships.
The passing of the Bill is laudable and a timely step in the digital age where cyber attackers and defenders are drawn into a continuous cat-and-mouse game amidst the dynamic cyber threat landscape. It demonstrates the country’s commitment to building its digital infrastructure ecosystem to further spur the digital evolution in Malaysia. As Malaysia advances towards a tech-driven economy, bolstering the nation’s cyber security posture with a robust cyber security framework is likely to promote greater confidence among international partners and investors and bring the country closer towards becoming ASEAN’s digital capital.
The information provided is for information purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained from qualified legal counsel for all specific situations.
We are pleased to announce that DFDL is extending its PRC network of collaborating firms through a cooperation agreement with Leaf, a distinguished law firm renowned for its expertise in Greater China, and offices in Shanghai, Beijing and Paris. Leaf’s Sino-European team has been recognized for its expertise on cross-border M&A transactions, corporate finance and fundraising. Leaf also has a significant cybersecurity and data protection law practice complemented by a team of technical experts. This collaboration initiative will strengthen DFDL’s European Desk and allow us to join a hub of professionals to coordinate work for Asian projects from Europe, both inbound and outbound, with a primary focus on European clients.
Established in 1994, DFDL is a leading international legal, tax and investment advisory firm with a robust presence across South-East Asia, boasting twelve offices across 10 countries including Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. DFDL and Leaf are multi-awarded law firms highly recognized for their knowledge and understanding of the legal and regulatory landscapes within their respective markets.
We are looking forward to this cooperation to expand our business horizons and, most importantly, to ensure that we continuously deliver seamless service to our valued clients.
For additional information, please feel free to contact Guillaume Massin ([email protected]) and Bruno Grangier ([email protected]).